Rising Youth Suicide Rates Raise Urgent Questions About Psychiatric Facility Accountability

Psychiatric Facilities Are Facing A Growing Mental Health Crisis Among Young Patients

If you placed a young family member in a psychiatric facility because you believed it was the safest place for them, you made that choice out of love. You trusted that trained professionals would keep your child, your teenager, or your young adult safe. When that trust is broken, the grief that follows is unlike almost anything else, and so is the question that won’t stop: could this have been prevented?

A landmark study published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirms what many families may have sensed for years. Researchers at the Huntsman Mental Health Institute at the University of Utah analyzed 122 years of U.S. mortality data and found that suicide risk among young people has been rising steadily since the mid-to-late 1950s. “What we’re seeing is not a short-term spike but a generational shift. Each successive generation has faced higher suicide risk at a younger age than the one before it,” said University of Utah assistant professor of psychiatry Nina de Lacy, the study’s lead researcher.

That finding matters for families dealing with the aftermath of a psychiatric facility’s failure. Rising youth suicide rates place a greater burden on mental health providers to meet the standard of care, not a lesser one. The Law Offices of Skip Simpson has spent decades holding psychiatric hospitals and mental health facilities accountable when they fail to protect the patients placed in their care.

What Did Researchers Discover About Suicide?

The University of Utah study drew on data spanning from 1900 to 2021, making it the most comprehensive long-term picture of U.S. suicide trends ever assembled. Historically, older adults have carried the highest suicide risk. That has shifted sharply. Today, suicide is among the leading causes of death for Americans between the ages of 10 and 34, and the research shows that rate climbed among younger people for more than six consecutive decades.

The study also found that if the country had maintained its lowest observed age-specific suicide rates, more than 372,000 deaths could have been prevented between 1969 and 2021. That number carries a weight that’s hard to absorb. It tells us these deaths were not inevitable. They happened because something wasn’t working, and in too many cases, what wasn’t working was the care inside a psychiatric facility—and they know it.

Some of the other findings deserve attention as well. The data showed that suicide rates among young women in rural and smaller urban communities have risen sharply in recent years, and that hanging has increased significantly as a method since the 1980s, forming what the researchers describe as a trend that has received far less attention than other methods. These are exactly the kinds of details that matter when assessing whether a facility took appropriate precautions.

Psychiatric Facilities Have Clear Responsibilities Under The Standard Of Care

When a patient is admitted to a psychiatric facility, that facility assumes a legal duty of care. The standard of care in suicide prevention is not vague or undefined. It includes specific, documented obligations that trained clinicians and facility staff are expected to follow.

  • Thorough Suicide Risk Assessment On Admission: Every patient admitted for psychiatric care must be assessed for suicide risk using accepted clinical protocols, not a brief intake form completed by an undertrained staff member. Competent clinicians know a suicidal person cannot be expected to volunteer the truth about suicide plans; the judgment of a suicidal person is clouded, thinking is confused, and cannot be relied upon to adequately assess its own dangerous state. The clinician MUST understand the Suicide Crisis Syndrome and its five recognizable criteria. See The Suicidal Crisis: Clinical Guide to the Assessment of Imminent Suicide Risk, Second Edition, Igor Galynker (2023). When a patient denies being suicidal, that is the start of the assessment, not the end.
  • Ongoing Monitoring Throughout The Patient’s Stay: A risk assessment done at admission does not cover the patient’s entire hospitalization. Facilities must reassess patients regularly, especially when their behavior or condition changes. Reassessment means a good systematic suicide assessment again. Know that the patient likely still wants to die. Hope is needed badly.
  • A Safe Physical Environment: Psychiatric units are required to remove or secure materials that a patient could use to harm themselves. Ligature points, unsecured medications, and inadequate room checks are all preventable failures. Pretend you are the patient and you want to die. How would you do it? Look around for ways you could kill yourself—the patient is.
  • Appropriate Level of Monitoring: Suicidal patients need to be on one-to-one monitoring or line-of-sight at all times. Patients who die in psychiatric hospitals are mostly on every 15-minute monitoring, a dangerous practice. Reducing staffing to cut costs while patients remain at serious risk is a serious breach of the standard of care.
  • Safe Discharge Planning: Releasing a patient who is still at elevated risk to go home without a proper safety plan, without follow-up appointments scheduled, and without family notification is one of the most dangerous failures a facility can make. The period after discharge is the most dangerous time for a suicide attempt.

These are not aspirational guidelines. They are the standard of care that courts and medical experts hold psychiatric facilities to, and when hospitals cut corners on any of them, the consequences can be catastrophic. If they are not, the hospital just got lucky.

Why Psychiatric Facilities Fail And Why Accountability Matters

Skip Simpson has spent many years handling these complex cases. The University of Utah study reinforces what our law firm has seen repeatedly: suicide risk among young patients is real, well-documented, and manageable when proper care is provided. The tragedy is that many facilities know the risks and still fail to take adequate action.

The protocols and practices inside many psychiatric hospitals reveals troubling patterns. The odds of any single patient dying by suicide may appear statistically low to administrators or insurers. But when warning signs are ignored, assessments are incompetent, monitoring is inadequate, room checks are rushed, staffing levels are inadequate, or discharge decisions are made too quickly, the risks increase dramatically.

After a death occurs, facilities and insurance carriers often move quickly to defend their decisions. In all cases, they attempt to shift blame onto the patient or the patient’s family rather than confront what the hospital failed to do.

This is why families should keep several important issues in mind:

  • Families Are Not To Blame: If a loved one was admitted to a psychiatric facility and died by suicide there, the facility’s conduct, not your family’s choices, is what the law examines.
  • Records Often Reveal What Happened: Medical records, staffing logs, room check documentation, and discharge paperwork may show whether the facility followed accepted standards or ignored them. Sometimes these records are altered—we catch them at this crime.
  • Time Limits Apply: States impose statutes of limitations on medical malpractice claims. Waiting too long to investigate can permanently affect a family’s ability to pursue accountability.

How We Help Families After Psychiatric Facility Failures

The Law Offices of Skip Simpson represents families across the country who have lost a loved one to suicide following failures in psychiatric care. Attorney Skip Simpson is nationally recognized in this area of law and has handled inpatient suicide cases in dozens of states.

When we take a case, we investigate the facility’s policies, examine staffing decisions, retain independent medical experts, and build the factual record necessary to determine whether the standard of care was violated.

If your family is trying to understand what happened to a loved one inside a psychiatric hospital or mental health facility, we are here to listen and provide a clear explanation of your legal options. You owe us nothing unless we recover compensation for your family. There are no upfront legal fees and no costs to begin the process.

Contact the Law Offices of Skip Simpson for a free, confidential consultation. Families who trusted a psychiatric facility to protect their loved one deserve answers, accountability, and a full understanding of what legal options may be available moving forward.

Military Suicide Rates Dropped In 2024, But Long-Term Trends Remain Concerning

Why One Year Of Improvement Doesn’t Change The Larger Pattern

Over the last decade, suicide rates in the military have increased, with the number of suicide deaths now exceeding combat deaths. In that context, a recent report from the Pentagon has some encouraging numbers: military suicides dropped by 11 percent in 2024.
That said, the 471 deaths among service members in 2024 are still far too high, representing a significant increase since 2011. More needs to be done to reverse this trend and keep military suicides down.

What’s behind the decrease in military suicides?

According to the Associated Press, at least some of the decrease in military suicides may be attributed to the military’s suicide prevention efforts. The Brandon Act, a 2021 law that was enacted in the wake of a Navy sailor’s suicide, allows service members to seek help “for any reason, at any time, and in any environment,” confidentially. Then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin also declared suicide prevention a priority during his tenure.
The AP report also noted that military suicide rates have tracked closely with the suicide rate of the general population, taking into account the demographics of the military (disproportionately young and male). According to the Pentagon, “the overall trend in suicide rates for active duty service members mirrors the increase in the U.S. population suicide rates over time.”

Why are members of the military at high risk of suicide

As noted above, members of the military are disproportionately young men, a population that is typically at a high baseline risk of dying by suicide. Furthermore, several aspects of military service can cause increased suicide risk:
  • Relationship problems often caused or exacerbated by physical distance from friends and family.
  • Financial stress.
  • Legal or disciplinary problems.
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Although combat exposure can increase the risk and intensity of mental health issues that contribute to suicide risk, according to the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), less than half of military members who die by suicide have ever been deployed or in combat.
In addition to increase risk of attempting suicide, members of the military are at a higher risk of actually dying by suicide. Service members have easy access to firearms, and firearms are far more lethal than other commonly used suicide methods. But even when they use other methods of suicide, service members seem to make more lethal suicide attempts than civilians, according to the ABCT.

If you have lost a loved one to suicide completion, we can help

Both the long-time rise in military suicides and the 2024 decrease speak to a larger truth: suicide is preventable, and policy choices can play a significant role in reducing suicide risk.
Knowing the warning signs of suicide and applying appropriate interventions can make a real difference. Conversely, when medical professionals and others responsible for the safety of a suicidal person fail in that responsibility, lives can be lost.
The Law Offices of Skip Simpson stands up for families who have lost loved ones to preventable suicides. Give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation.

Study Links Broadband Internet Access to Teen Suicide Risk

It’s perhaps unsurprising that the rise of the internet and social media has affected teen mental health. But a new study has shed further light on the role exposure to technology plays in teens’ suicide risk.

As The 74 recently reported, a new study circulated through the National Bureau of Economic Research found a clear connection between broadband access and kids’ mental health. The result: when broadband access becomes more ubiquitous, mental health gets worse.

Breaking down the study results

According to Brandyn Churchill, an economist at American University and the lead author of the new study, researchers took advantage of the uneven pace of broadband expansion across the country. They tracked the deployment of broadband between 2009, when about 70 percent of the nation had broadband coverage, and 2019, when about 90 percent was covered.

The results were striking. As soon as broadband arrived, children spent more time online, and as they spent more time online, the rate of suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts went up dramatically: 68 percent and 64 percent, respectively, among those who spent more than five hours online per day.

The study also found that with each increase in broadband access, adolescent girls were nine percent more likely to complain of cyberbullying, and 10 percent more likely to consider themselves overweight (despite no difference in actual weight). Boys, meanwhile, were about 10 percent more likely to say they weren’t getting enough sleep each night.

Why the connection between broadband and mental health?

The study authors posited that the switch from dial-up to broadband meant kids had access, not just to the internet generally, but to particular parts of the internet that are unwieldy at dial-up speeds. In particular, they were able to access photo- and video-based social media like Instagram, Snapchat, and (toward the end of the window covered by the study) TikTok.

Access to those more visual platforms may have contributed not only to teens spending more time online, but also to being bullied for their appearance and/or comparing themselves unfavorably to other people.

The transition to high-speed broadband changed the internet from a tool for information into an engine for constant social comparison. It’s no longer just about “being online”—it’s about the algorithmic delivery of content that reinforces a child’s deepest insecurities. When a teenager’s already vulnerable, this 24/7 exposure can accelerate a mental health crisis faster than traditional outpatient care can catch it.

The study results are part of a growing body of research that shows a disturbing connection between internet and social media usage and declining teen mental health. As the debate over phone usage in schools and in general continues, suicide risk needs to be a prominent part of the discussion.

What can be done to protect teens from suicide risk?

It would likely be impossible to push back the adoption of broadband internet, mobile phones, and other new technologies, and it’s not clear how helpful that would be even if it were possible. There are benefits to internet access, too; some teens, particularly in the LGBT community, have reported finding a sense of community and belonging online. However, the research is detailed that internet and social media use need to be limited, with healthy boundaries.

Furthermore, medical professionals who treat children and adolescents need to be aware of the role that internet access can play in mental health. That may mean recommending limits on internet access to parents and guardians. It also means incorporating questions about social media use into suicide screenings, following up, and recommending appropriate interventions to save lives.

In today’s world, a suicide risk assessment that doesn’t account for a teen’s digital environment is incomplete. If a doctor knows a child is struggling with depression or body dysmorphia but fails to ask about cyberbullying or “pro-harm” online communities, they’ve missed a critical intervention point. We argue that staying current with these digital risk factors isn’t optional; it’s a fundamental part of the standard of care for adolescent mental health.

If you have lost a loved one to suicide completion, we can fight for accountability

The more we learn about the causes and risk factors for suicide, the more robust efforts we can make to reduce the number of deaths by suicide. More research, however, is inadequate without action. When medical professionals fail to recognize the warning signs of suicide risk, lives can be lost. Suicide is preventable, and when it’s not prevented, there must be accountability.

Accountability starts with recognizing that suicide is a predictable and preventable outcome when risk factors are ignored. Whether it’s a school counselor who brushed off reports of cyberbullying or a psychiatrist who didn’t adjust a safety plan despite a teen’s escalating social media distress, these aren’t just “tragedies.” They’re often the result of systemic failures to protect a child from known, documented dangers.

The Law Offices of Skip Simpson proudly represents families who have lost loved ones to suicide throughout the United States. Give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. There’s no pressure and no obligation, just answers about your rights and options.

Can Clinics Be Liable for Failing to Screen for Suicide Risk in HIV Patients?

It’s well known that people with chronic illnesses are at a higher risk of dying by suicide than the general population. And a diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be devastating.

A new South African study has provided troubling insights into the heightened risk of suicide among people living with HIV. It also raises questions regarding the responsibility of HIV clinics and physicians to protect their patients from the risk of suicide.

The link between chronic illness and suicide risk

Numerous studies have shown that chronic illness is linked to a higher suicide risk. For example, a 2017 study found that 17 physical health conditions were associated with increased suicide risk after an adjustment for age and sex, with nine of those associations persisting even when an adjustment was made for mental health and substance use. Among those conditions studied, the three with the highest suicide risk were traumatic brain injury, sleep disorders, and HIV/AIDS.

There are several reasons why chronic illnesses may cause an increase in suicide risk, including:

  • Chronic pain and other symptoms: For people living with severe symptoms, suicide may seem like a way to make the pain stop.
  • Perceived burdensomeness and loss of independence: People with chronic illnesses can become highly dependent on others, impacting their self-worth and feeding into the false narrative that their loved ones would be better off without them.
  • Feelings of hopelessness: An incurable condition can lead to a loss of hope, which in turn can feed into mental health conditions like depression and anxiety.
  • Social isolation and loss of enjoyment of life: People with chronic diseases may be unable to participate in social activities, causing their relationships with friends and family to atrophy, and lose the sense of enjoyment and satisfaction from activities they can no longer do due to their condition.
  • Medication side effects: Some medications used to treat chronic illnesses may cause or exacerbate suicidal thoughts.

HIV is a particularly challenging chronic illness to live with, so it is little surprise that it has been linked to increased suicide risk. HIV/AIDS can cause a variety of debilitating symptoms, and it is currently impossible to cure. That said, with modern antiretroviral treatments, people with HIV can live long, healthy, and normal lives.

The importance of suicide screening in HIV treatment settings

One of the key insights from the South African study was that most people with HIV who died by suicide had interacted with a healthcare setting within the year before their death. That means there is a real opportunity for clinics and providers to prevent deaths by conducting appropriate suicide screenings.

However, more training is needed to equip doctors and other medical professionals who treat people with HIV to conduct appropriate screenings and refer to appropriate mental health resources. It’s not unusual for physicians who specialize in treating physical health conditions to fail to consider their patients’ mental health, but that should not be the standard of care. Doctors need to treat the whole patient, and that includes taking into account the elevated risk that a chronically ill patient might die by suicide.

If you have lost a loved one due to negligence, we can help

Suicide is preventable, and medical professionals who don’t provide the care at-risk patients need should be held accountable. The Law Offices of Skip Simpson can help. If you have lost a loved one, give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. We’re based in Texas but serve families throughout the United States.

New Study Links Head Injury to Suicide Risk

While we usually think of suicide as a mental health problem, there are important links between physical health, physical injury, and suicide risk. Among those connections is a link between head injuries and suicide risk.

A recent study, published in the American Academy of Neurology’s peer-reviewed journal, shed some light on this connection. While it’s well-known that traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with an increased risk of suicide, this study found that head injuries more generally are also linked to suicide risk.

What the study results showed

The UK-based study compared adults with and without head injuries over a 20-year period, matching them by age, sex, and geographical location. The top-level result was clear: people with head injuries had more suicide attempts, more suicide risk factors, and more deaths by suicide.

The study found that the risk of suicide was highest in the first 12 months after the head injury itself. It also found that people with other suicide risk factors, including a history of mental health conditions and lack of social connection, had particularly elevated risk—but even among those with no other risk factors, head injuries were still correlated with increased risk of suicide.

The study authors suggested that suicide risk assessment and prevention should be used for people with head injuries, especially in the first 12 months after the injury—even in people with no mental health history. These results are important for physicians and other medical professionals who care for people with head injuries, from nurses to neurologists.

Doctors need to take suicide risk into account when caring for injured patients

This study focused on head injuries, but it’s indicative of a larger truth: when treating patients for physical injuries and illnesses, physicians need to be aware of suicide risk factors and conduct appropriate assessments. As we’ve previously written, physical conditions such as traumatic brain injuries, post-partum complications, and chronic pain have all been linked to increased suicidality. Medical professionals who treat people with those conditions need to treat the whole patient, taking into account suicide risk and mental health more generally. The same is true for patients with non-TBI head injuries.

When doctors focus exclusively on physical health and ignore warning signs of suicide or self-harm risk, patients can suffer irreparably. More research is needed on the specific links between injury and suicide risk, as well as the specific interventions that are needed for patients with each type of injury. What is clear, though, is that physicians of all specialties have a critical role to play in suicide prevention.

If you lost a loved one to suicide completion, we can help

Suicide is preventable, and when a medical professional’s failure to provide adequate care leads to death by suicide, accountability is critical. The Law Offices of Skip Simpson fights for families who have lost loved ones throughout the United States.

If you lost a loved one to suicide completion, we would be honored to listen to your story and explain your legal options. Give us a call or contact us online today.

Michigan Data Highlights Rural Suicide Risks

Families in rural communities often face barriers that others never have to consider

Suicide risk is caused by a combination of factors, and many of those factors vary geographically. It’s not surprising, then, that we see suicide rates vary significantly from place to place.

A case study from Michigan sheds light on a national problem: in rural areas, suicide rates are often quite high, sometimes double the risk in more populated areas.

What the Michigan data shows

Data released by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services showed climbing suicide rates across the state, especially among middle-aged residents. While the largest number of suicides were in highly populated parts of the state—after all, that’s where the most people are—on a per capita basis, the data showed that rural counties in the northern part of the state had the highest rates.

The overall suicide rate in Michigan in 2023 was 14.9 suicides per 100,000 residents, according to the data. But some counties have significantly higher rates—Alcona County, which covers a large rural area on the shores of Lake Huron, had 35.4 suicides per 100,000 residents for the decade ending in 2023, which was more than double the statewide rate.

What drives suicide risk in rural areas?

There are two critical characteristics of rural counties that tend to result in more suicides. First, in rural areas, access to mental health services is quite limited. Some residents may need to drive 40 miles or more to access a mental health provider in person.

Telehealth can partially compensate for these problems, but many rural areas also lack reliable internet access, so that is not a feasible solution for a large number of residents. More broadly, rural residents also lack access to the same kinds of broad, supportive social networks that are available in more populated areas.

Second, rural areas have much higher gun ownership than urban and suburban areas. Rural residents at risk of suicide are highly likely to own a gun or have access to a gun. And access to firearms is a major driver of suicide deaths, because guns are much more lethal than any other commonly used suicide method.

In other words, a suicidal person with access to firearms is much more likely to actually complete suicide.

Another driver of suicide risk is the high rate of poverty in many rural areas. Financial stress can increase the risk of suicide, and people living in poverty are less likely to be able to pay for mental health services and other supports, even if they could access them otherwise.

Suicide prevention efforts need to recognize the unique challenges of rural areas

Suicide is preventable (believe it!!), and prevention efforts, which will work, need to be tailored to the needs of different communities. In the case of rural areas, efforts must be made to find ways for residents to reliably access mental health services, given their geographic isolation and lack of infrastructure.

Medical professionals who serve rural areas need to be particularly aware of the risk of suicide, conduct proper screenings, and recommend appropriate, accessible resources. When they don’t, the consequences can be deadly.

The Law Offices of Skip Simpson proudly serves families who have lost loved ones to suicide completion throughout the United States, fighting for accountability and justice. We would be honored to listen to your story and explain your legal rights and options.

Give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation.

Study: Personal Connection Can Help Suicide Prevention Resources Reach Veterans

The veteran suicide rate remains twice as high as that of non-veterans

Veterans have made countless sacrifices for our country, and one that doesn’t get enough attention is the toll their service can take on mental health, leading to increased risk of suicide.

A recent study from the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah sheds light on what can be done to help at-risk veterans access suicide prevention resources. According to the Institute, personal connection may be the key to unlocking those resources and reducing veterans’ suicide risk.

The suicide crisis among America’s veterans

Veterans have long been known to have a highly elevated suicide risk. According to the Veterans Administration, the veteran suicide rate of 34.7 deaths per 100,000 is about double the suicide rate for non-veteran adults. According to the American Psychological Association, some reasons for this elevated risk include:

  • Mental illness associated with military service, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
  • Physical injuries, including traumatic brain injuries (TBI), which can affect mental health.
  • Difficulty transitioning back to civilian life—suicide risk among veterans is highest in the years immediately following separation from the military.
  • Easy access to and familiarity with guns, which are by far the most lethal and commonly used suicide method.
  • Stress, burnout, isolation, and loneliness.

Key findings from the Gardner Institute study

The Gardner Institute’s research found that personal connection plays a vital role in allowing veterans to reach suicide prevention resources. Veterans are more likely to trust information from sources they know personally, including their doctors and therapists, as well as their friends, family, and peers.

The research also showed that overcoming mistrust in mental health resources will be a critical step. For instance, just over one-third of the veterans surveyed said they trusted mental health crisis response services—but a majority of those who had actually used such services said they found the response helpful. In other words, once veterans actually have the opportunity to access services, they are more likely to see the value of those services.

Another key to veteran suicide prevention is simply providing veterans with access to information. The study found that 25% of veterans have never even looked for information on mental health and suicide prevention resources, and 17% are unsure how to access them.

Finally, the study highlighted both systemic and personal barriers to accessing mental health care, including the “warrior ethos” among current and former military members, fear that accessing mental health resources could affect career advancement, and highly practical concerns such as long wait times to access services. Policymakers need to do their part to lower those systemic barriers, and we all need to do our part to end the stigma around mental health treatment, both for veterans and for society at large.

Medical professionals need to be aware of suicide risks and barriers to treatment

Veterans are one of several populations at elevated risk of suicide, and each of those populations has its own unique challenges. Medical professionals who treat patients at risk of suicide need to be aware of the complex, interconnected factors that affect suicide risk. They also need to recognize both the importance of mental health services and the barriers to accessing those services, and work with each patient to overcome those barriers and get them the treatment they need.

Unfortunately, too many medical professionals fail in that responsibility, and the result can be a preventable tragedy. The Law Offices of Skip Simpson is here to advocate for justice for victims and their families. If you have lost a loved one to suicide completion, give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. We serve families throughout the United States.

ChatGPT Linked to Teen Suicides

Wrongful Death Case Raises Ethical Questions About AI in Mental Health Support

AI chatbots can’t replace licensed mental health professionals

It goes without saying that one of the biggest stories of the last several years has been the rise of generative AI products such as ChatGPT. AI is increasingly used for professional and personal purposes, and when used safely, it can be a useful tool. However, talking to ChatGPT is no substitute for real human interaction, and sometimes, using it that way can be deadly.
NBC News recently reported on the story of a teenager, Adam Raine, who died by suicide after extensive communications with ChatGPT. According to the NBC article, the bot went from helping him with his homework to “becoming his ‘suicide coach,'” acknowledging and even encouraging his suicide attempts.
 “He would be here but for ChatGPT. I 100% believe that,” his father, Matt Raine, told NBC.

High-profile deaths by suicide are indicative of a larger problem

Suicides linked to the use of AI chatbots have drawn significant attention this year. Mr. Raine and another grieving parent, Megan Garcia, even testified at a congressional hearing last month. Both have brought lawsuits against AI companies.
These concerns about chatbots and suicide risk are part of a larger conversation about the risks of generative AI in mental health. A recent Stanford study, for example, found that AI chatbots are ineffective and dangerous alternatives to human therapists.
The researchers noted that AI models reinforced stigma toward mental health conditions, like alcohol dependence and schizophrenia, which can lead at-risk patients to become frustrated and even discontinue mental health care.
More alarmingly still, the Stanford study tested AI chatbots’ responses to suicidal ideation and other dangerous behaviors in a conversational setting. In these scenarios, the researchers found that the chatbots would actually enable dangerous behavior.
Notably, the chatbots examined in the Stanford study were designed specifically to work as “therapy bots.” A generalized AI chatbot like ChatGPT might be even more dangerous when confronted with warning signs of a mental health crisis.

While AI may have some applications in mental health, it can’t replace human intervention

That’s not to say that AI tools have no place in mental health care. Last year, the American Psychological Association wrote that AI can be used as part of psychological practice to detect warning signs of mental health concerns, monitor patients’ symptoms, and even aid in clinical decision-making. The key, however, is that it should be used as a tool for a well-trained, experienced, human mental health professional, not a replacement.
Certainly, the tragic losses of multiple teens due to the use of generative AI are a warning that parents need to more closely monitor their children’s technology use and respond to any warning signs of suicide. But there’s a bigger takeaway here: the need for human connection in an increasingly technologically driven world.
People who are at risk of suicide or another mental health crisis need to be surrounded by other people who know them, know the warning signs, and can recommend the right resources. Just as importantly, they need access to real mental health treatment instead of leaning on unreliable and often dangerous generative AI “therapy bots.”

Our law firm stands up for families who have lost loved ones to suicide

These stories about generative AI are a sobering reminder that suicide is preventable with the right interventions. Unfortunately, too many families lose loved ones because the people responsible for their safety didn’t do their jobs. Our mission is to fight for justice and accountability for those families.
If you have lost a loved one to suicide completion, we are prepared to listen to your story and explain your legal rights and options. Schedule your free consultation with the Law Offices of Skip Simpson today. We serve families throughout the United States.

September is National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month

Suicide is preventable.

We’re closing out National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month this September, but the truth is that suicide prevention needs to be a year-round focus. People who die by suicide show warning signs beforehand, and if the people in their lives know what to look for, they can intervene. And those efforts are not futile, because suicide is not inevitable. The right interventions can save lives.

This month and every month, let’s remain committed to suicide prevention.

How friends and family can help prevent suicide

According to the National Institute of Mental Health, the first step to suicide prevention is to ask if you have reason to suspect someone is thinking about suicide. Remember, study after study has shown that asking about suicide does not increase suicidal behavior or thoughts. To the contrary, asking is the best way to start the conversation and build a connection with someone who is at risk. And that’s critical, because studies have also shown that listening, acknowledging, and talking about suicide can actually help to reduce suicide risk.

Another important step is to limit access to lethal means. Limiting access to firearms is especially important because guns are much deadlier than other commonly used suicide methods. Other lethal means, including knives, medications, and loopables (any item that can be used to make a noose), likewise need to be safely stored to reduce access, especially when the suicidal person is alone.

It’s critical to refer the at-risk person to mental health resources. The 988 Lifeline is a valuable first point of contact for people who are in immediate crisis. Depending on the situation, a person at risk of suicide may need inpatient or outpatient mental health treatment or other medical services.

Finally, loved ones need to follow up and stay connected with the at-risk person. The immediate crisis may have passed, but the underlying issues that led them to become suicidal may still be there, and a lack of connection is one such risk factor. Staying in ongoing, supportive contact after a mental health crisis can dramatically reduce suicide risk.

The role of medical professionals in suicide prevention

As the American Association of Suicidology puts it, suicide is everyone’s business. We all have a role to play in preventing suicide and ensuring that those at risk of dying by suicide get the support and resources they need. However, medical professionals have a particularly significant role to play, both because they work with at-risk people every day, and because they have specialized training and responsibility for their patients’ health.

Unfortunately, it’s far too common for physicians and other medical professionals to fail to take important, medically indicated steps to reduce the risk of patient suicide. When that happens, lives can be lost unnecessarily. Our job is to hold them accountable.

If you have lost a loved one to preventable suicide, contact us

Too many families are left to rebuild their shattered lives after losing a loved one to suicide completion. Our mission is to fight for accountability and justice for those families. We would be honored to listen to your story and explain your legal rights and options.

Contact us online today for a free, confidential consultation with the Law Offices of Skip Simpson. We’re based in Texas and serve families nationwide.

The Role of Workplace Safety Leaders in Suicide Prevention

An upset male worker sitting alone in a dark storage container.

Suicide prevention needs to be a top safety priority in the workplace

Approximately 70% of suicides in the United States are among working-age adults (age 18-64), the majority of whom are currently employed. That means, whether or not a particular suicide is related to work or occurs at work, workplaces have an important role to play in suicide prevention.

As Occupational Health & Safety Magazine reported, this subject has recently gained traction in the construction industry, focusing on the role of safety professionals in preventing worker suicide. Suicide risk in the workplace is a real problem, and managers, coworkers, and safety professionals must do their part to minimize that risk.

Safety professionals need to look beyond physical safety to address mental health as well

When most people think of workplace safety, they likely think of physical safety measures: hard hats, harnesses, warning signs, fire prevention, and security guards, for example. But safety leaders in the workplace need to look beyond those physical measures to take stock of the mental health of their colleagues.

As the Occupational Health & Safety article pointed out, many behaviors that indicate suicide risk may manifest at work, such as isolating from colleagues, expressing feelings of hopelessness, or taking extreme risks. Workplace leaders need to know the warning signs of suicide and respond appropriately. They also need to create a warm, supportive environment where colleagues are comfortable talking about their feelings and asking for help.

These steps are particularly important in occupations with elevated suicide rates, such as mining, construction, entertainment, and agriculture. Furthermore, if a colleague has known suicide risk factors, such as chronic pain or a history of depression or self-harm, safety leaders should be particularly attentive to those risks.

Employers can provide important resources to help employees manage suicide risk

While employers need to maintain appropriate boundaries when dealing with employees’ mental health, there is still a great deal they can do to help reduce the risk of suicide, such as:

  • Training managers and safety professionals in suicide prevention techniques, such as the QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) method. (Full disclosure. Skip Simpson is honored to be on the faculty of the QPR Institute.)
  • Providing resources for employees, such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs), that can assist with mental health issues.
  • Providing flexible schedules and time off for employees to attend counseling or receive medical treatment.
  • Cultivating a supportive, open environment for employees.
  • Promptly addressing any workplace issues that can increase suicide risk, including workplace harassment and abuse.

Ultimately, however, employers are not their employees’ healthcare providers. Employers can provide resources and flexibility, and they can encourage at-risk employees to get help, but it’s up to medical professionals to actually treat the causes of suicide risk and keep their patients safe. When they fail in that responsibility, lives can be lost.

We stand up for families who have lost loved ones to suicide completion

Suicide is preventable, and when medical professionals fail to protect their patients, The Law Offices of Skip Simpson works to hold them accountable. If you have lost a loved one to suicide completion, we would be honored to listen to your story and explain your options. Our consultation is free and confidential, and there is no obligation to hire us if we determine there is a viable case. Give us a call or contact us online today. We’re based in Texas but represent families nationwide.